AITOOW thought Lester Holt asked trivial questions and allowed the candidates to waste our time last night? The "birther" question? Was that another example of a black man's obsession with his color (and therefor had to reach for topics concerning color) or a coordinated (with the democrats) attempt to undo whatever inroads Trump had made with blacks? And "stop and frisk", etc. Was this the Afro-American Presidential Debate or the American Presidential Debate? And I love how the press has subsequently chosen the birther exchange as a "key" moment and ignored the counter charge that Team Rodham instigated the witch hunt in 08. I'm glad he reminded us of their concurrent attempt to smear Obama with the African garb photo. I forgot about that. Also passed over by the press.
I also wonder why Team Trump isn't all over Rodham for cheating the American people over a substantive debate. Her puerile, younger sibling instigating (and Lester's choice of questions) took focus away (purposefully) from the issues. Now you can blame him for taking the bait, but, I believe that the initial protagonist is always to blame when an altercation occurs. You can't have B if A does not occur. Once again, she is the sneaky little sister (or the sociopath played by Sara Geller) in Cruel Intentions) that pokes you under the table until you give her a whack. Then she cries bloody murder and you get punished by your simpleton parents.
I also wish Chris Christie was there to "Marco Rubio" shame her for giving canned answers. I really wish it wouldn't be deemed sexist by the true sexists to insinuate that she has a stick up her ass. I would also like to reiterate (past post) that if our society deems bigotry to be the worse character flaw a person can have then we should use the term sparingly and judiciously. Not carelessly or opportunistically.
I will also add that I'm surprised that Team Rodham hasn't jumped on "Lazy Donald Trump". He can't be bothered to study. His staff takes a crap for him. Etcetera.
No comments:
Post a Comment