AITOOW wonders why gentrification is a one way street? Or at least unfortunate in one way. How exactly did these neighborhoods become black (not middle class) to begin with? Was that not a change in social dynamics? Who wouldn't be demonized if they uttered a disparaging word about that? In fact, such racially charged behavior would be considered the height of intolerable behavior and you would be observed to see whether you added a "white flight" condemnation chaser. And that is just for thoughts or words. And in one case the "invasion" destroys (potentially) value while the other improves the neighborhood. Is the only acceptable answer for the white man to gift improvements to blacks and walk away? Blacks who allowed to discriminate against such benefactors. Maybe the white man should just hand over the deed to his own home? What kind of degenerative cognition would promote/defend that?
While we are on the topic. How does diversity (especially on campus) benefit non-black students? It is always brought up as justification for itself. But why is it tolerated/promoted? I know how social engineering/imbalancing helps them. I just don't see what they bring to the table. At best they are there as live capture exhibits to brainwash other races into pitying their circumstances (increasing empathy) so the program of charity will continue after graduation. I'd love to hear what being around them (and we know this doesn't even happen and students tribalize themselves) accomplishes.
No comments:
Post a Comment