AITOOW doesn't think its wise for networks to have politicos grading a debate? The way they see things is not how many see things (or we would be bowing at the altar of Karl Marx). They care way too much about substance. And more importantly Marxist substance. The average voter is too disengaged to be influenced by that. If they want to know who won the debate, bring in a cross section of voters. But, maybe they don't want to know. Maybe they want to crown the "right" candidate?
BTW. Peggy Hill should have mentioned that leaders beholden to a pacifict movement don't have the flexibility to fake force in diplomatic discussions. She should have also said "do you want a fish or a fishing pole". Unfortunately, most Americans have grown so lazy and dependent they probably have no reservations about taking the fish.
No comments:
Post a Comment