AITOOW thinks it is typical that when the talking heads are talking about the latest chapter in the Clinton crime spree that they try and misdirect with such brilliant legal arguments as: "everyone else was doing it" (which doesn't draw factual distinctions to that spurious allegation) or "someone should have saved her from herself/put a stop to it" (which either puts the blame on those she presided over or her one superior - the President). I do agree that it is sad that the practice was either condoned or missed, but, what more would you expect from this inept Administration and Hillary's crooked compatriots (search Huma's alleged transgressions for starters). How long until they attack the accuser? I also love that they call the "laws" she broke "rules". The really interesting component of this State Dept revelation is why it was released. We know it is not because the system isn't corrupt. I wonder if it is a concession by the ruling party that Hillary needs to be replaced (and not by Bernie). If not by Obama (for Biden) then maybe Kerry for himself. .Don't be surprised if she is disqualified (by the shadowy power brokers of her own party) before the election.
This all reminds me of a story some DC insiders told my family on Safari in the 90's. They alleged that Hillary was "involved" with Vince Foster and that is what got him killed (not suicide). So many intrigues with this chipmunk. You kiddies should go back and read Primary Colors. Anybody remember that? The black love child sub plot was memorable.
No comments:
Post a Comment